home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1995
/
1095.doc
/
001631_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Mon Oct 30 05:44:47 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-11-07
|
2KB
Received: by mail.webcom.com
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA001040687; Mon, 30 Oct 1995 05:44:47 -0800
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com>
Received: from minnie.risd.edu by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA299950682; Mon, 30 Oct 1995 05:44:42 -0800
Received: by minnie.risd.edu; id AA00997; Mon, 30 Oct 1995 08:41:45 -0500
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1995 08:41:45 -0500 (EST)
From: Joe Angell <jangell@risd.edu>
Subject: Re: os2 ?????
To: Jerel Smith <jerel@feral.acsu.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: post it <lightwave@mail.webcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.951031001630.10380A-100000@feral.acsu.unsw.edu.au>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9510300818.C907-0100000@minnie.risd.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
> Ive been on this mailer for a couple of months and ive never seen
> anything about os2 .Is anyone running LW intel under os2 because
> im curious to wether it is more memory effcient than the
> microsoft os (WIN95 , NT).
I think ANYTHING is more effiecient than WinNT as far as RAM goes (or
Win95, for that matter...) :)
I think there was a discussion of this before, and the general concensus
was that LW dies under OS/2 I don't have an IBM, so I wasn't really
following this thread, though...
-- Joe
--
Joe Angell <jangell@risd.edu> sent this message.
To Post a Message : lightwave@webcom.com
Un/Subscription Requests To : lightwave-request@webcom.com
(DIGEST) or : lightwave-digest-request@webcom.com
Administrative Items To : owner-lightwave@webcom.com